Quote:
|
it will run on the recommended hardware we specified for Windows Vista and that the applications and devices that work with Windows Vista will be compatible with Windows 7
|
Shouldn't that have also been the case for Vista itself?
So we're to wait 3 more years for them to get Vista right though it will be known by a different name..
Shouldn't any hardware I buy ever be compatible with a future version of Windows, other than when it is too slow (i.e. CPU/Mem), drives, scanners, printers, joysticks etc etc should always be compatible unless you don't support them intentionally to make people upgrade? Glad to hear they won't be dicking their customers too badly this time around.
I assume all purchasers of Vista will get a free upgrade to Windows 7?
Do they expect us to believe that the recommended performance spec for an OS to be released 3 years from now will be hardware we bought 3 years prior?
That's a clever bit of marketing there. Say it'll run on todays hardware but not how well. Hell. Every new MS OS would run on 3 year old hardware (albeit slow as a dog), except Vista. Now it's a marketing positive? or just a polite way to apologise for what they've done to their customers in the last 18 months.
All hardware will have moved considerably by then. To get top performance you'll still need current day hardware, this leopard doesn't change it's spots, or are they saying to their hardware buddies "Don't expect to sell anything new in the next 3 years cause no one will need it for Windows 7". Way to go. Should make the HW guys happy.
Haven't seen quiet so much floundering from MS in a while...
Keep your Nvidia 7600!'s people... They should be performing great.....
Sometime Real soon now (tm).
Cheers,
Arkay.