Thread: WHS - Network Transfer Performance - Some Storage Pool Observations
View Single Post
Old 22nd June 2008, 02:37 PM   #9 (permalink)
Mike
 
Mike's Avatar
Status Mike is Offline:
Location Sydney
ActivityPosts: 6,476
Reputation & Thanks Support Rating:
Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike
Points Earned: 1633

Mike has been Thanked 244 times in 127 posts
Mike's
Media Center
Re: WHS - Network Transfer Performance - Some Storage Pool Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by krypto View Post
I use teracopy and fastcopy to copy between my WHS and my PCs and get much faster transfer rates.
Hey thanks for the info krypto - tried Fastcopy and didn't like it too much - but Terracopy - man that rocks!!

Using it now to copy directories across and discovered that it sets up queues for each job - so I've set up about 6 jobs to cover 660GB and left it alone.

The speed achieved is fantastic (not from the WHS storage pool btw) - I'm currently using Extreme's server which has a lot of the data I need - waaay quicker than trying to prise so much data out of the WHS storage pool using Windoze copy.

Once again - thanks for the heads up on TC - both Extreme and I are really impressed with it!

Mike
__________________
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.
  Reply With Quote